Originally Posted by BillyGoatGruff
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
Originally Posted by BillyGoatGruff
There are a lot of holy mofo's on here per always.

Hard to argue against "impaired" drivers. Let's not be hypocritical though. The driver's license tests should be more strict, and more often, and on a graduated scale so that by the time you increase in age you get tested more often. Drug levels for drivers should not be limited to alcohol, THC, and opioids. It should also include, all the xanex, etc that the Dr.'s hand out like candy. Old folk with slow reflex's and poor eyesight are no less a threat than joe six pack who had a beer after work and headed home. If you live in a wintry environ, the test should include winter driving, i.e. on snow and ice. If you drive with no license, or not within your restrictions (corrective lenses etc) you should face the same penalty as a DUI.


There’s a lot of logic and truth in the above post. Asians should be tested weekly and those over 80 daily. 😉

Driving around parts of Arizona during the height of gray hair snowbird season is far more dangerous than driving with an equal number of drunks.

If it saves just one life it’s worth it....🖕


It'll never fly though, just too easy for the dried up old biddies and holy rollers to rail on that demonic firewater. If it were TRULY about impaired driving, it would include psychotropics, age, and retardation levels in the penalty/restrictions. I'm not advocating for drunk driving, it just irks the hell out of me to be preached to. Germany is often brought up as an example of driving nirvana. As I've yet to make a trip there, I don't know, but I'd guess it's probably a little harder to get a license and there are a host of moving violations that carry stiffer penalties than here. Which BTW I'm ok with. Less drivers the better lol


More laws are always the answer.....