Ok, so it seems we've accepted that the repubs are interested in divesting lands? Glad we've moved on.
In general, its OK to preserve landscapes that no one can access too. In fact that may be more important than the tracts that we can access.
I can tell you that I sent Chaffetz a message on that one and I am not a utah resident. His defense of his "sportsman" character shows how backed into a corner he got by the army of orange.
Chaffetz seemed to have a good head on his shoulders but ultimately he's a politician and getting chewed up and spit out is part of the game. He should of ignored his big money interests on that one. I will say from someone who detests the republicans position on public lands, I think the party may have gotten the message, so his sacrifice is our grandchildren's gain temporary gain.
