During the last decade or two we have seen the 45 gap, 357 sig, 5.7 x 28, 40SW, 10mm...
All of which offer advantages over their predecessors. They don't make it because handgun owners are stodgy old cusses that are resistant to change. In what other area does "new" apply to 40-year old products (Glock)?
Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense. Robert Frost
