TRH, do you even realize you are no longer arguing for darwinian evolution but intelligent design and even intelligent CONTROL?
You are just under the mistaken belief that evolutionists propose that evolution is a random process. They do not propose that.
Here's Richard Dawkins propounding this to someone else who made the same mistake.
No, no, no, the debate is about the genetic variability presented to the environment. It IS believed to be random. That is where the discussion about mathematic impossibility takes place NOT in the selection process. Come on. Of course the theory is that the environment makes the selections. But if there isn't sufficient genetic variability over enough time, IT CAN'T.
But there evidently is enough, since the evidence for it having occurred is overwhelming. Nothing is more supported by the evidence than that speciation occurred and that all species are, to one extent or another, related to one another.
