Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by RickyD
Originally Posted by DBT
Evolution is a fact. Theory relates to the means and mechanisms by which it happens.

A "fact" like any other lying lieberal "fact". A fact that is a lie.


It's the quality and abundance of evidence, information that anyone can examine, that makes something a fact.

The problem is not that there is insufficient evidence/information to establish evolution as being a fact, there is.....but that there are folks who are unwilling to consider the evidence because they, themselves prefer magical answers, special creation through an act of magic over research and careful examination of the evidence.....in other words, a bias in favour of their preferred religion.


What evidence? Explain the mechanism by which life first appeared. Explain the mechanism by which viable mutations are caused. Not how they are selected, but by what mechanism they are caused.

Until you are able to explain how something happened, all of the “evidence” can be taken any way you want it.

It isn’t the proponents of intelligent design who are afraid to consider alternative explanations. It is the Darwinian evolutionists. You rule out the possible influence of an intelligent mind on evolution simply because you refuse to countenance the possibility that such an intelligence could even exist.



First off, you are conflating evidence for evolution with evidence for biogenesis/angiogenesis, which are different issues. The issue of how life began, a work in progress, does not mean that evolution itself has not been established.

The evidence that supports evolution is readily available.

Last edited by DBT; 07/24/19.