M9...

Here is what you posted:



I say:

I don’t believe in a god because I haven’t seen evidence, and there has been a long history of no evidence.

You say:

Doesn’t mean there’s no god (ie implying that I could be wrong). (Yep)

Like it or not, I have reached my decision.




Your initial statement was that God did not exist and that belief in god required a great leap of faith... ie belief in something that does not exist. You were mocking "belief."

You got backed into a corner ...you could not back up what you said and could not admit that you were wrong,,,,,you are now again waffling.... ....you attempted to recast your position and have now altered your position...NOW you say that you don't believe because you "haven't seen the evidence."

Yes, of course you could be wrong.....My comment stands .... just because YOU have not experienced God does not mean that He does not exist. You cannot possibly know that God does not exist.


The tax collector said: “Lord Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner.” Jesus said he went home “justified.”