A fatal flaw with your position is that you must admit that the child is human. From that, all else for you fails.
The child is human. Because it has it's own unique DNA for a human, it is then a distinct individual human and is not simply a "growth" or "part" of any other human. It is alive and a separate human being on it's own.
You cannot, then, continue to refer to that child as "someone else's" to do with as they choose. Your assertion reduces the child to the status of mere property. This cannot be. The only way for a distinct, individual human being to be the mere property of another to be disposed of as they see fit is via slavery. That is specifically outlawed in the United States. There is no other way for a person to possess another human as mere property other than by definition through slavery.
So, please continue now that you have (and must) admit that the child is, in fact, a distinct individual human being.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
