Maybe you are different in real life, but you come across as one sick, screwed-up person. So - to you some determination of "viable" is the pivotal criterion for moral/legal killing of a child. And whom do you identify as the all-knowing power that decides such viability in life??
That inability on your part makes the posed question regarding murder after birth even more cogent. How and why would/could you hold reponsible a parent who murdered a post-partum child whom the parent had decided was not sufficiently viable?
If you would hold it legal/moral/ethical murder such a questionable child before birth, why would you not murder one after birth? See - there it is again - your dilemma - and it has nothing to do with another person attempting to force morals or ethics upon you.
You obviously have me confused with someone who cares what you think.
I already answered you, so any "inability" is yours, in not understanding it's really none of your business
You come across as an arrogant, holier-than-thou legend in your own mind. But that's another topic altoghether
You just keep spouting the same tired rhetoric
One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!
