And there it is again No proof, just opinion It's not "a person" under the law, but you keep claiming the law says it is.
Prove me wrong. You've not done so yet. Prove how the child it not a distinct, individual human being that is NOT therefore a "person".
You've not yet engaged to any degree on any logical, moral, or philosophical level. The ball remains in your court, and you've got MUCH ground to cover in order to catch up. I'm not holding my breath on your ability to do so, but please feel free to try.
I've proven you're a mindless parrot who can only repeat lame rhetoric.
I told you that before all this started, and you have shown it to be reality.
I told you this was pointless in the first post I made.
I really don't care if you agree or disagree Why does that confuse you so?
I'm not interested in seeing who can be the most stupid for the longest time.
Last edited by Snyper; 02/01/16.
One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!
