two anti gun d-bags agree with each other

wow - amazing

Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by 4ager
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by TheOldTree
So, you old f'ers ain't ever going to need anything PP provides. Your tax dollars are not going for abortions. Even if they did, PP is saving the taxpayers money. real money.
Conservatives used to mind their own gd business. Keep on trying to regulate what women can and can't do, and the Republicans will keep on losing.


Exactly. Turns out women have gotten to be pretty uppity these days, and resent others, especially old, angry white men, telling them what they can do or cannot do with their uteri. Some call it the Republican war on women.

Bobby, you might be surprised how many people don't know the difference. I've explained it to gunsmiths and high end gun dealers a few times.


The woman's uterus is not in question; classic red herring. She is not deciding whether to keep or dispose of her uterus. The issue is whether the arbitrary murder of a distinct, individual human being for nothing more than mere convenience is a logical, moral, or philosophically defensible position. To date, none have been able to articulate why it would be.


That is exactly the argument that typifies the War on Women, and explains why our next president will be a Democrat. What part of MYOFB don't you understand? Again, Roe v Wade, 1973:


"The Court issued its decision on January 22, 1973, with a 7-to-2 majority vote in favor of Roe. Justices Burger, Douglas, and Stewart filed concurring opinions, and Justice White filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Rehnquist joined. Burger's, Douglas's, and White's opinions were issued along with the Court's opinion in Doe v. Bolton (announced on the same day as Roe v. Wade). The Court deemed abortion a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, thereby subjecting all laws attempting to restrict it to the standard of strict scrutiny.[29]"