Originally Posted by kellory
Originally Posted by FreeMe
Originally Posted by kellory
... As for sea friendly, I doubt he gave a damn about comfort. Survival was the design parameters.


"Comfort" implies luxury. That's not at all what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the difference between getting knocked off your feet, slammed against walls, and puking continuously. Kind of hard to eat under those conditions. Makes survival kind of questionable. Need more room because the boat doesn't have square corners? Make a bigger boat.

Appears you and the people behind that program spent little time in boats.


But then...maybe the waters were dead calm the whole time (miracle). But that brings up the question, why bother with a boat instead of miraculously saving them on a miraculous mountain top? Or why have a flood at all? Why not just miraculously snap fingers and proclaim all the evil people dead?

There you go making assumptions without any facts to back them up. I happen to like boats. I rebuilt a sailboat and taught my son to sail, and even taught him how to right a sailboat in deep water. I helped in the reconstruction of a steel hull 30' cabin cruiser as well. You have no basis for your assumption.



Not an assumption. I expected that you might correct that observation. The "appearance" was there, base on your apparent lack of understanding how the issue goes beyond "comfort".

So - how much time have you spent on a boat in rough water? In different hull shapes (round vs flat)? Personally - I've been all over the map with that.

Lunatic fringe....we all know you're out there.