Yep. A guy who wants to "prove something" can make them land wherever he wants.
So you are calling him a liar. How is that any different than if he said you killed those animals at 50 yds but you simply say they were at long range? He has as much evidence as you do. But I'm guessing he would never do such a thing. Calling somebody a liar like that devoid of any evidence whatsoever is really poor form.
Quote
Funny you should state your doubts about how many Leupolds were in the top percentage at the SHC.
Nothing "funny" about it. It was a very simple question. If you know the answer, please simply state it. No need for color commentary.
Quote
Seems to me you should be discounting what the other 107 competitors used
Durability and repeatability are statistical measures. Examples of one are statistically insignificant. If, say, 1/2 of the competitors use said scopes with few complaints, that would be significant. But that's not the case, is it? Even 1/4 of them. One guy, not so much--especially with so much evidence to the contrary.
