I was done, but Jack posted this and I thought it was important.
Jack is promoting Jack.
One of the basic techniques Snopes and others use to judge veracity in a case like this is to examine the motivation of the "expert," specifically whether they stand to gain anything via their testimony or in this case, commentary.
Asking Jack Belk (who makes money writing about unsafe gun designs) whether a gun design is unsafe is the same as asking a barber if you need a haircut.
I'm guessing you've been walking around bald most of your life.
