Originally Posted by bobhanson1
Did he ever mention if he was wearing safety glasses? If the jury didn't hear the pressure info. that would almost make the fact that it was a reload a moot point so what else did he do/not do that he hasn't said to make them find him 40% at fault?
I wouldn't find it far fetched for the jury to find 40% at fault for simply going to a shooting range to test loads, believing that to be an assumption of risk. The OP did say the jury gave no qualification for the 40%, nor were they asked to do so by either side.


We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?

Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.