I don't care who won the case or what the attorneys argued. They did that for their own reasons. I would be interested in the truth and facts, something that is unobtainable apparently.
There is no such thing as truth and facts. Truth is always dependent upon perspective and facts are always interpreted according to that perspective. That is reality.
For instance. Is a gun that will open up, but only under excess pressure defective? Who can say? Some would say, that a gun that will open up at all before completely blowing up is defective. Some would say that it isn't the gun but the load. Who is right? Mostly a matter of opinion I would guess. After all, a somewhat excessive load is foreseeable as that even factory ammunition makers sometimes make mistakes. On the other hand, how can a firearms manufacturer be responsible for someone making a bomb instead of a cartridge?
