There's a very simple explanation for all of this. Mr. Ward blew up a gun and sued the manufacturer. But the simple fact is, if you handload and blow up a gun, there's no way to prove that the round you blew up the gun with wasn't faulty. But that doesn't let the gun manufacturer off the hook entirely.
The jury didn't think it was entirely T/C's fault, but the gun blew up and injured the Mr. Ward, so they thought he deserved something. They decided on a 60/40 split but we don't know their rationale.
That was not enough in Mr. Ward's opinion, so now Mr. Ward is trying to "get back" at T/C, the only way he knows how, by posting his version of the facts or side of the story all over the internet.
What more needs to be said? The grandiosity of the thread title says it all, don't you think?
