I'm not looking at this from an attorneys prospective I am looking at this from shooters prospective. First thing I want to know is what the pressure in the loads were.
From what I can see there are lots of serviceable encore rifles out there getting shot every day, all have the same design, why are the not all failing? Did this one fail because of excessive pressure in conjunction with a design flaw? Is the flaw only exposed at excessive pressure? etc...
I don't care who won the case or what the attorneys argued. They did that for their own reasons. I would be interested in the truth and facts, something that is unobtainable apparently.
Well said.
BTW - from an attorney's perspective, getting the "expert" and the tenuous pressure data from software disqualified would be simple and it apparently was. No lab tests; no data; no tickey, no service.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
