So fact really don't matter to Padidler?
therefore in conclusion, say someone said he was a pedophile.... according to Padidlers standards, that person wouldn't have to provide any real proof and we all should accept whatever is said as gospel?
Remember this is a hypothetical question, but I am just trying to follow the logic Padidler is wanting us to follow...
eg: Facts aren't needed, and we should take someone's words at face value...
