That depends upon the definition and context of faith. Christian faith is based upon being fully persuaded to affirm the truth having examined the facts of the case and having come to a conclusion. The evidence in the "court-room" is overwhelming- the conclusion is faith. An affirmation of the truth having been persuaded.
Faith also includes trust in a person, (God) once you have gotten to know Him.
Your definition of faith is just your (unknowing) straw man forced off on your antagonists in this debate; it is not rooted in any Christian creed or confession or systematic theology.
Once again; John Locke, "The Reasonableness of Christianity"
Sir Robert Anderson proves the precise fulfillment of the Daniel 9 prophecy as to the time of the Hebrew Messiah "cut off but not for Himself". Just prior to the destruction of the Temple. Which is exactly what happened but predicted by a space of over 400 years.
Undeniable proof that God exists and has revealed Himself via the Hebrew prophets and the Lord Jesus Christ.
And much more from Isaiah; starting with chapter 53
But if Christ Himself manifested and healed on the wrong day or the wrong person you would still not be persuaded.
Last edited by Robert_White; 09/30/16.
Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven.
