The reason I use the word "stupid" to describe the choice of a .308 for long range shooting or hunting is that there are about 30 calibers which are easily better choices.
A 30-06 is a far better choice. It has a flatter trajectory and bucks the wind better.
A .300 magnum is better still.
Then there are calibers like .270 and the 7mms. Why shoot some wimpy .308 168 grain bullet at 2600 fps (or a 155 grain at 2950 with a 32" barrel) when you can easily get 3200 fps or so with a better BC bullet?
The .308 never (I mean NEVER) wins long range championships at Camp Perry except for a few matches where it is the only allowed caliber. It's a bummer.
As for heavy barrels, I concede, if what you are really doing is shooting game from a bench rest, as opposed to carrying the rifle up the mountains. But at least get a heavy barreled rifle in a decent long range caliber.
Of course, if a certain .308 has "sentimental value," that's something else.
Don't argue with me about the .308. Just look at any ballistics tables.
Last edited by IndyCA35; 10/26/05.
