Also, the Infectious Disease Society of America endorses RT-PCR as the diagnostic standard, but I'm sure those infectious disease docs don't have access to the kind of high quality "research" that you do....
Once again clown, the inventor of the PCR test himself has stated the design of the PCR test was never to be used as a diagnostics tool.
What part of cold hard evidence do you not appreciate, comprehend or are able to absorb into your two brain cells?
The cycle CT in the PCR test can be changed to whatever you want it to produce, and that is how they were able to create the false positives during last year to keep the numbers high.
Your inability to produce solid evidence is really getting tiresome.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
