The bones were found fifteen feet deep in loose sand, not in a rock matrix. Their postures were similar to known Indian burials. The bones were unfossilized and partly decayed, and dating them yielded an age of 210 +/- 70 years. In short, they were a fairly recent burial (Kuban 1998).
This is certainly different from the first reports. The photo I saw of the mine showed the fossil were found at least 100 feet below grade in solid undisturbed sediment. It reminds me of the 108% of the voters in one county voted 100% for Obama. There is no way for us laymen to get the original facts since it contradicts the evolutionary dogma.
Rule #1 in Crisis Management.
The first reports are always wrong.
As for what happened in your above example, it's nothing unusual. A layman things he finds something interesting until the trained scientist show up.
Last edited by antelope_sniper; 07/26/14.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
