Jesus has the same problem as Muhammad, no secular contemporary references to him. Jesus is references in a single copy of Tacitus and that's been proven to be a medieval insertion. The next earliest secular reference to him is something like 180 years after his supposed life, years after the New Testiment books were circulating for decades. Likewise, Muhammad wasn't praised or mentioned in a single military dispatch during the Arab conquest of North Africa, with his first non-Koranic reference appearing about 120 years after his supposed death.
In both instances, the "contemporary" references, arenot contemporary.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
