Ringman, as I said, I don't doubt the guy has been published.
So you've demonstrated something that wasn't in doubt.
Here's my question (again) so pay attention:
Which one of the articles you listed supports a 6,000 year-old earth?
Also just so we're clear on this, a quick perusal of your list includes papers presented at conferences.
I've presented papers at conferences. They are not peer reviewed, and they are not refereed journals.
You apparently don't understand the difference in presenting a paper at a conference, and publishing a paper in refereed journal.
When you present a paper at a conference, it's the first look your peers get at it. Most papers presented at a conference are only preceded by an abstract.
