Must not have liked the magazine.

Originally Posted by Dave_Skinner
It's fine being for "roadless backcountry" at the expense of all other public land uses....


Dave, seeing as how roadless areas comprise a small percentage of public lands, and "all other uses" occur on the majority of public lands, I think you're guilty of hyperbole. In other words, that's a crock.

Do you think the percentage of public lands maintained as roadless needs to be zero? Sure sounds like it.


Originally Posted by Dave_Skinner
And I guess it's just fine to support the environmental part of the political agenda, and vote to give power to the Democrats, who aren't exactly the greatest supporters of either gun rights, hunting, or America's strength in the world....


Dave, did you get fired from the bakery for stealing inventory? Because that right there takes the cake, LOL!!!

Are you telling me that keeping a small percentage of our public lands roadless gives power to democrats, and will lead to the loss of gun rights, hunting, and the decline of America??

Seriously Dave. Did you make that up all by yourself, or did you have help?

PS,you left out "apple pie," and the only thing you've upset is common sense.





A wise man is frequently humbled.