His equating Roadless to be the same as Wilderness was a nice way for him to pad his numbers. And ignore the fact that there are huge differences in management between the two outside of travel management.
Not to mention that the state with the most acreage affected by the federal roadless rule (Idaho) came up with their own plan (the Idaho roadless rule) that varies from the federal roadless rule and was developed with input from all the local stakeholders, including loggers.
So much for the "federal land grab" in the state most impacted.
Colorado did the same, by the way. That takes about 14 million acres out of the equation.
