What we know in my opinion: 1. The officers had the man subdued and at some point the man went unconscious and unresponsive. 2. The officers should have observed that a man in their custody went unconscious and they should have gotten him medical attention.
What we don't know for sure: 1. What the.actual cause of death is and whether any medical assistance would have stopped it. 2. What was in the minds and hearts of the officers at the time of the incident.
We have to wait for the autopsy and/or investigation for more information. To say someone is guilty of murder you have to prove intentional and deliberate killing of another with malice aforethought. To me it LOOKS more like negligence. They should have noticed the man in their custody went unconscious and had a medic check on him.
100% agreed.
Especially this, which has been my entire point:
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
To me it LOOKS more like negligence. They should have noticed the man in their custody went unconscious and had a medic check on him.
The DIPCHIT ADD, after a morning of drinking:
You despair, repeatedly, constantly! daily basis? A despair ninny. Sack up, despire ninny.
