LOL, "again you duck and dodge." This is the big game forum, who said anything about shooting mice?

For big game, shooting a bullet at 100 fps makes no sense. As you tried hard not to admit above.

So when you asked me whether I'd shoot a bullet at 100 fps, you were asking me whether I'd do something that makes no sense to you.

Does that make sense to you?


Never mind, stupid question. Of course it makes sense to you.



______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quoted for posterity:

Originally Posted by Coyote_Hunter
Originally Posted by smokepole
You didn't answer the question "does shooting a bullet at 100 fps make sense to you?"

That's the answer I'm waiting to hear.


"Shooting bullets at 100fps might be adequate for taking mice. For elk I use a rule of thumb of 1500fpe. It would take a 10-pound bullet at 100fps to generate 1500fpe. Not very practical and range would suck."


But I'm repeating myself...

If you need a single monosyllabic answer to understand the answer, it would be "No". But using 100fps as I did to prove a point is perfectly valid. If energy doesn't matter then velocity doesn't matter either.







A wise man is frequently humbled.