Absence of evidence. Without evidence, there is no reason to be convinced.
So when an atheist asserts they have “evidence to the contrary”…exactly like was done above…but they can’t provide that evidence…exactly like was done above…there is no reason to be convinced of their assertion. Got it.
Evidence to the contrary is the evidence we have for natural evolution over special creation.
What about the “evidence to the contrary” that God does exist…? What about the “evidence to the contrary” that Jesus did exist…? What about the “evidence to the contrary” that Jesus was resurrected…? And what about the “evidence to the contrary” that natural evolution was the method used for special creation…?
