No where is something equated with nothing. That is why you just cut and paste and the sentence is so short. It's bald.
What is Bald is your failure to read the article and consider what it says about the problems with the Kalams cosmological argument.
You are not willing to consider the possibility of being wrong.
You yourself believe in something from nothing, that a God - whatever that is supposed to be - just spoke the Universe into existence from nothing..."let there be light, and there was light."
