So you want a world where people have to prove a negative rather than proving the positive. So if I were to accuse you of being a child molester and give zero evidence to support that accusation it would still be up to you to provide evidence that you were not a child molester. And if you can't provide hard evidence that disproves my claim then it means I'm right and you are indeed a child molester.
People don’t “have to prove” anything. You can believe whatever it is that you choose to believe, and I’m OK with it. And I can choose to believe whatever it is that I choose to believe, even if you’re not OK with it.
Originally Posted by Willto
That the way you want the world to proceed? That the standard you want to implement? Because I think that's madness.
The world can proceed with you believing whatever it is that you choose to believe, and I’m OK with it. The world can proceed with me believing whatever it is that I choose to believe, even if you’re not OK with it.
