I already asked this of another guy who said this thread was supposedly about Craig Boddington and the .270: Did you actually read Indy's original post?
Here it is:
"In an article in the current issue of "American Rifleman," Craig Boddington states that, "In my opinion these three similar 6.5mms (6.5x55, .260 Remington, and 6.5 Creedmoor), despite the magical properties currently attributed to them, do not equal the 96-year-old .270 Winchester as a hunting cartridge.
"He then goes on to describe why in four pages. It's a good read."
There's the reason this thread got going on the 6.5 Creedmoor along with the .270, right in the first post. The 6.5 Creedmoor did not sneak in there 10 pages later.
Who has accused you of not being a rifle loony because you don't own a rifle chambered for a 6.5mm cartridge? Give me some names and I will personally hunt them down and stuff photos of your rifles up their, uh, noses.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
