The_Real_Hawkeye,

If you go back and read the post, you will notice I was speculating. It makes no difference if we are talking [bleep] dogs or a common ancestor. Do the math; and use only 2% differnce. There ain't no way Poncho.

The original study you are siting as I also sited for the 98% was when the scientists excpected to find close matches. Therefore they looked in the places they thought they would find matches: viola 98%. Then as they continued to map the DNA, they discovered lots of irregularities. This revised the number to 97%.


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter