Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Scientists Observe Evolution in Twenty Year Experiment

"Any extrapolation of micro-evolution to "prove" that evolutionary theory we reject as unscientific."

Very much like tossing out the baby with the bathwater.

As was mentioned previously, the definition of micro and macro evolution has been arbitrary and is the responsibility of the user to define it.

If something is rejected scientifically, what is the metric involved? And what level of precision used?

What are the units of a macro, is it divisible by micros? And if so, how many micros equals one macro.

The inability to clearly and unambiguously define micros and macros would suggests that the rejection was/is based on something other than science.


Addendum: It's cool if you can't. Just don't make the claim that your position is based on science but was/is based on personal bias.