As has been aptly pointed out many times, the evolution observed in this experiment was micro (within the species), not macro (from one species to another). We believe in micro, so that is not the point in dispute. Observing micro-evolution does not prove macro-evolution--that is the logical disconnect of evolution.
Your approach is typical of evolutionists who run out of objective arguments--simply say to your opponent that if you had my level of education or intelligence you would see things my way.
Is this an attitude that developed from observing intelligent design or has it evolved in your mind by way of random, spontaneous and accidental postulations?
