I think most of us would define "one species into another species (macro)" as a frog becoming something other than a frog.
That would be a change in genus, not species. Genus is a larger category than species, and usually contains many species within each.
It does not matter how you spin the arguments or define the terms, whether as commonly used or with scientific precision, when contemplating the full theory of evolution as to the origins of life you need to have an uncaused first cause which brought about matter that spontaneously generated life which evolved into many different genus and species. This you cannot demonstrate or prove in the least which leaves the total (macro) evolutionary theory in the whole as nothing but unproven assumptions.
Its simply what some people want to believe, not that which is credible to believe based upon scientific evidence.
