"It does not matter how you spin the arguments or define the terms, whether as commonly used or with scientific precision, when contemplating the full theory of evolution as to the origins of life you need to have an uncaused first cause which brought about matter that spontaneously generated life which evolved into many different genus and species. This you cannot demonstrate or prove in the least which leaves the total (macro) evolutionary theory in the whole as nothing but unproven assumptions."
Spin or not, if you really are interested in knowing whether your position is based on science or personal bias, you need to prove that there is a clear, unambiguous difference between the micro and macro evolution. It is the crux of your argument. So far, you have failed in every way to do so.
Like I said before, it's cool if you choose to ignore something fundamental and not dealing with it props up your belief system.
