Thunder, I am not the one bothered by an exact boundary between life and nonlife. I am not the one basing my argument on the inability of science to "prove" how "life" started. I am the one saying that the boundary is fuzzy and, therefore, should not be the basis for your argument. You are the one who has to come up with a universally acceptable definition, not me. I don't think there is one, but you seem to think there is.
What are your credentials? How many degrees do you have that concentrated on evolutionary theory or even Biology?
