Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Wrongside
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith

All scopes are mechanically flawless when they do nothing but collect dust in the safe.

Originally Posted by ctsmith
Anyone who has above mediocre range time knows the limitation of Leupold. This is a fact that hunters that don't shoot much can't seem to cope with.

The hunter can argue that those limitations do not extend to their use of the scope, which could absolutely be the case.

And thats really what it boils down to. A "one time a year, zero-check & hunt guy", has very different expectations from the guys who shoot year round, a few times per week, and possibly competes in various shooting displines. Different uses, experience levels, and expectations.


A person who rides a bicycle 10 miles through a park every weekend can be perfectly well served with a $500, 25 pound bike. Those that train daily and race 75 miles every weekend would not be well served with the same bicycle. Yet on bicycle forums, oddly enough, you don't have a dedicated group of blowhards running down the $500 bike at every opportunity.

I'm sure you'd be right in there, playing the obtuse troll defender of the 'good enough/just as good $500 bicycle', if there were.


Originally Posted by Llama_Bob
I've seen more well-shot game lost with TSXs than any other premium bullet.