2) The 2 tracts that had feet on them were not privately owned.
3) Eshelman doesn't want flights in to the public owned land either.
The discussion here is of taking private lands (at public expense) to give a very few access through those private lands.
What in the Holy Hell is wrong with flying into the public lands? Except that the hunter is on the hook for the cost of the flight time, rather than foisting the cost onto the taxpayer?
What Eshelman wants is of no consequence!
The subject of the thread is referring to the legal proceedings about corner crossing from one existing tract of public land to another existing tract of public land. No trespassing involved at all so it isn't clear why you would bring up what you described as trespassing pheasant hunters.
Eshelman and a large number of people supporting him having control of property he does not own seem to think what he wants does matter.
