The case was decided on a summary judgment motion.
Which is the Judge's way a tellin the plaintiff he never shoulda even filed.
BHA had nothin ta do with such a simple legal decision.
BHA is a suckass organization, tryin ta ride the coattails of this case ta disguise its liberal positions.
Just like a tarquim post on the 'fire.
I certainly agree with this assessment about BHA's bogus involvement in the case. They did virtually NOTHING but grandstand and attempt to take credit for the result- which leaves more resources for BHA's anti-gun activities.
