Just look to Stalin's Russia to know exactly where it ends.
Federal seizures of all lands and businesses.
There is a hell of big difference between eminent domain to build a new freeway for millions to use each year, or seizing a piece of private property so six hunters can get across to what they think might be a honey hole.
The landowner should be blocked from using public land he has the public locked from. It works both ways.
Tell me why shouldn't one or several legal hunters have access to public land? Any access obtained by ED is open to everyone, not just six hunters, and it isn't communism in any manner, shape, nor form to provide access to Public land to The Public.
You're reaching here. This is not a seizure of "all lands and businesses" by any stretch. It's a small measured remedy for a big original mistake.
What would be mildly entertaining is if there is a federal law mandating any land seized for public purposes that is not used for public purpose must be offered for sale to the original owners/their heirs for the original acquisition price.
