I see it as the exact opposite. Private landowners have been impeding the public access to public land for the better part of several decades (with the support of the WY justice system) and finally a case made it through the court system that says Federal Law says you can't do it.
I would encourage you to read the court's opinion that dismissed the civil suit.
Civil suit should have been dismissed. No harm was done to Eshelmans property. Criminal trespass is another matter entirely and should have gotten a conviction.
Nope, and the federal judge disagrees with you, so does the law.
Just admit you lost, is it that hard to say you're just flat wrong?
