a short fat road hunter lecturing others on hiking. That's hilarious Buzzy
Can you share yours and John Burns' "Wyoming Mountain ready" work out and diet regime?
step one: go to Walmart and buy few liters of Vodka, NyQuil and wonder bread, Twinkies and corn syrup to dip your wonder bread in and Mountain Dew . Don't forget to pick up extra paddle locks to lock out forest service roads so you have no hunting pressure
Step two; create an account at BHA and praise Ryan Busses and Land Tawney's gun ban lobbies
step three. put yourself in for a fake BHA award for virtue signaling
step four. tell everyone that randy newborn never received and free tags or any compensation for pimping public land hunts to rubes
LOL
Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
And this is pure unadulterated bullschitt, exactly typical for a grifter and conman. The ONLY person to gain benefit from this ruling is the individual who actually hikes his ass in over public ground to the aforementioned corner and subsequently hikes his ass on beyond. The other 339,999,990 people in the nation gain absolutely nothing. But you just keep on telling your lies and taking your fair share of the collection plate.
So now the true colors start coming out. Because you're too lazy to hike, that's the problem? Well, toughen up cupcake and buy some hiking boots.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
So says every litigator before he hears the ruling from the appellate court.
Did you read Skavdahl's judgement?
The only thing that can be appealed is whether or not he ruled on the law and if the laws he cited were applicable to the case. For your reference, no judge wants his rulings overturned by a higher court. That's why they cite State and Federal Law and how that law has been applied in the past and how its pertinent to their case.
Please point out the flaws in Judge Skavdahl's application of the law, cited laws, and the applicability of previous court rulings.
The judgement is only 32 pages long. Report back with where you think an appeal would be granted by the 10th circuit, because I'm not seeing anything a higher court could disagree with.
