2) The 2 tracts that had feet on them were not privately owned.
3) Eshelman doesn't want flights in to the public owned land either.
The discussion here is of taking private lands (at public expense) to give a very few access through those private lands.
What in the Holy Hell is wrong with flying into the public lands? Except that the hunter is on the hook for the cost of the flight time, rather than foisting the cost onto the taxpayer?
What Eshelman wants is of no consequence!
According to the judge in the case, no one is taking private lands.................assuming we're sticking with the topic of the original post.
Others have brought eminent domain, passage corridors and such into the discussion.
This is the Campfire ya' know...................hard to keep all these folks concentrating on the topic at hand.
The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men. In it is contentment In it is death and all you seek (Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)
