Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by BuzzH
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by alwaysoutdoors
Originally Posted by Hastings
The personal attacks are a bit out of place maybe? I was enjoying the discussion about the right of passage issue. Not knowing anything about the Buzz person or the BHA I was very pleased to see the courts come down on the side of the little man, the everyday citizen trying to access his property that is his by right of being a U.S. citizen.

I am fortunate to own enough property to satisfy my needs but a lot of folks aren't and as I have stated earlier I spent a 30 year career dealing with wealthy men that wanted the state to keep the "riff raff" far away from their property.

I'm wondering what the big deal is with Buzz and what difference does it make about the .243W vs. the 6mm Rem?
I think it stems from BuzzyTard being affiliated with gun grabbers.
Oh,

Hastings, don't believe Tommybot/Fibka...here is BHA's official position statement on the second:

North American Policy Statement:

Backcountry Hunters & Anglers proudly supports the individual right to keep and bear arms as
guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/ba...mendment_Policy_Statement.pdf?1579635386

Does that include ARs?
I am not being a smart ass. I am genuinely curious.

Lots of people and organizations ‘support’ the 2nd Amendment but have varied interpretations as to what arms the 2nd applies to and ‘assault’ rifles are front and center.

Heck, there are a few ‘staunch’ 2nd supporters here on the ‘Fire that feel restricting full auto weapons is perfectly acceptable and that the 2nd doesn’t apply.

Correct. Even Biden says he supports the 2nd amendment. No one should give anything to BHA.