I don’t have this corner crossing issue where I hunt in Mississippi but if the public land has no reasonable access, then it’s not very public.
So from a land owner prospect, is the issue not being compensated for the crossing itself? What would that compensation look like? Sounds like the land owner has an advantage over the rest of the public because he has unfettered access.

I’m guessing easements should have been taken care of when the surrounding properties were bought?

I’m on the fence with this one. Pun intended.


Clyde


The liberal mind is an endless black hole of stupidity.