And this is pure unadulterated bullschitt, exactly typical for a grifter and conman. The ONLY person to gain benefit from this ruling is the individual who actually hikes his ass in over public ground to the aforementioned corner and subsequently hikes his ass on beyond. The other 339,999,990 people in the nation gain absolutely nothing. But you just keep on telling your lies and taking your fair share of the collection plate.
So now the true colors start coming out. Because you're too lazy to hike, that's the problem? Well, toughen up cupcake and buy some hiking boots.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
So says every litigator before he hears the ruling from the appellate court.
Did you read Skavdahl's judgement?
The only thing that can be appealed is whether or not he ruled on the law and if the laws he cited were applicable to the case. For your reference, no judge wants his rulings overturned by a higher court. That's why they cite State and Federal Law and how that law has been applied in the past and how its pertinent to their case.
Please point out the flaws in Judge Skavdahl's application of the law, cited laws, and the applicability of previous court rulings.
The judgement is only 32 pages long. Report back with where you think an appeal would be granted by the 10th circuit, because I'm not seeing anything a higher court could disagree with.
