Originally Posted by RayF
Originally Posted by IndyCA35
And if you think there is no evidence in the fossil record for evolution, then you are not very bright.

But is it sufficient enough to establish interspecies evolution as a fact?

Points off for spelling and grammar are welcomed. 😉

It is incontestably proven that a huge meteorite struck the Earth 66 million years ago and left the Chixlub Crater which is 110 miles in diameter and 12 miles in depth.. It is commonly known as the K-T extinction event.

[Linked Image from science.org]

[Linked Image from media.sciencephoto.com]

No dinosaurs have ever been found above the K-T boundary line, nor have large mammals been found below the line.

Barring evolution, how does one explain the proliferation of mammalian species up to and including man over the last 66 million years?

Or do you deny the very existence of a period when reptiles dominated the Earth, and their extinction 66 million years ago?

It has been mentioned that "the theory of evolution" is a controversial subject. It is only controversial to one who enters the discussion with pre-concieved notions which make it impossible to recognize the validity of facts.

Religion does that to many a person. When your religion makes it impossible to accept natural laws and observable facts........perhaps it is time to question your religion. Just ask Galileo Galilei, Giordano Bruno, and Hypatia of Alexandria. Copernicus only avoided the Inquisitors because he died before they could get hold of him.

People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.