Prior to Darwin, biologists and naturalists had observed that evolution was evidently a reality based on overwhelming observed evidence. What Darwin contributed was an argument for the mechanism (or one major mechanism), which he called natural selection. That theory has yet to be disproved, and is highly explanatory of what science observes.
Hawkeye, with genuine respect, “Overwhelming observed evidence” is subjective, which is why it is still a theory. And while it hasn’t been disproven, it does not mean their conclusions or the theory are facts.
Not only subjective, but like Swiss cheese, science isn’t without its holes.
George Washington was killed by science of his day and today, we all look at that as barbaric. “Follow the science” lacks the recognition that science changes as more science is discovered. Science never created a single thing, it has only been an issue of discovery that has been proven wrong in some cases as more correct discoveries have come along.
This is the biggest fallacy of science, to recognize it’s imperfections…
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/63b8KsVp/DSCN4329.jpg)
